Principal Investigator, Dr. Felicia Chow, Talks about the New Lyme Clinical Trials Center at UCSF

UCSF Parnassus campus San Francisco
By Bay Area Lyme Foundation

BAL Leading the Way Series

 

“I was seeing more and more patients here at UCSF who hadn’t traveled to Massachusetts, New Jersey, or other places endemic for Lyme, but rather had just been in the California Bay Area or on West Coast trips to places that we don’t consider—at least by the classic maps—as being endemic Lyme areas.”

– Felicia Chow, MD, Associate Professor of Neurology and Medicine at University of California, San Francisco

Felicia Chow, MD

There’s been much excitement in the Lyme community regarding the founding and development of the Lyme Clinical Trials Network since it was first announced. With a $1m seminal grant from Bay Area Lyme Foundation, UCSF joined the Clinical Trials Network to further study and develop better treatments for patients with Lyme and other tick-borne diseases. The Network aims to address the need for high quality, innovative clinical trials to develop evidence-based treatments for patients with persistent Lyme symptoms following initial antibiotic treatment—a population that has grown to more than two million Americans and continues to increase. We sat down with Principal Investigator, Dr. Felicia Chow, to learn more about plans for this California Clinical Trials Network node, and her role as Director of the UCSF Neuro-Infectious Diseases Clinic. 

Dr. Chow is a neurologist specializing in infectious diseases. This means she’s particularly interested in how pathogens like bacteria, viruses, and parasites, invade the nervous system and cause neurological damage and/or symptoms. Her expertise is in managing conditions such as brain abscesses, neurocysticercosis (a parasitic infection of the brain), neurosyphilis, and neurological complications associated with HIV. Additionally, she is well-versed in infectious causes of meningitis, encephalitis, and myelitis.

The Long and Winding Road: The Story of Bay Area Lyme’s Multi-Year Quest to Identify Treatments for Lyme Patients

West Coast Clinical Trial Story
By Bay Area Lyme Foundation

BAL Leading the Way Series

 

“The opening of a network of Lyme disease clinics is the culmination of many years of tireless work and the vision of a small group of determined women over 10 years ago. We are extremely optimistic that the Lyme Clinical Trials Network will accelerate the development of new treatments for patients with post-treatment and persistent Lyme disease.”

—Linda Giampa, Executive Director, Bay Area Lyme Foundation

 

When Bay Area Lyme Foundation (BAL) was formed a decade ago, its mission was clear: to make Lyme disease easy to diagnose and simple to cure. “And that’s still our goal,” emphasizes BAL co-founder Bonnie Crater, as she reflects on the last 10 years. However, appreciating the magnitude of the Foundation’s audacious mission requires an understanding of two complex—yet inextricably linked—medical domains: the world of diagnostics, and the world of therapeutics.

Bonnie Crater
Bay Area Lyme Co-Founder Bonnie Crater

The ‘Holy Grail’ for Lyme disease is an accurate diagnostic test—or better yet a suite of specifically designed tests for the different stages of acute and persistent Lyme disease. Although great strides are being made in understanding the infection and the disease’s progression, the ‘silver bullet’ of accurate diagnostic tests continues to elude us. The current diagnostics for acute Lyme (a two-step process with an ELISA either followed by a Western blot or another ELISA) are fraught with problems. These tests may miss up to 70% of acute Lyme cases or deliver false negative results. They are unreliable for detecting acute Lyme and are ineffective indicators for anyone with a persistent/chronic tick-borne infection. (Watch or listen to our Ticktective with Brandon Jutras, PhD, to learn why the current direct detection tests for Lyme are so inaccurate.)

Add to this the fact that FDA-approved therapeutics—or ‘cures’—have not evolved much in 10 years either and foment controversy. A quick internet search on ‘How to treat Lyme disease’ will offer information from the IDSA (Infectious Diseases Society of America) stating that a 10-14-day course of oral antibiotics, such as amoxicillin or doxycycline, will do the job for someone with an EM (Erythema migrans) rash who has early/acute Lyme. But anyone who has had Lyme disease, been treated, and then experienced a continuation of symptoms knows that this recommended course of intervention often fails to clear the infection, leaving some persistent Lyme patients in limbo, and health care providers without an approved treatment protocol. Simply put, this is the continuing underlying treacherous terrain of Lyme, throwing up challenges in both diagnostics and therapeutics.